13-38

Title: 13-38







Description

Given that an SD or MSP could partially comply with Regulation 23.504 by establishing and maintaining the required written policies and procedures, the Division has determined to grant only part of the relief requested. In addition, the Division is persuaded by the requesters that its no-action relief would best be structured by counterparty type to rapidly achieve compliance for a large volume of Covered Transactions while providing appropriate relief to the SDs, MSPs and counterparties that need more time to establish documentation compliant with Regulation 23.504.

13-37

Title: 13-37







Description

Time-Limited No-Action Relief: Request that Certain Swaps Not Be Considered in Calculating Aggregate Gross Notional Amount for Purposes of the Swap Dealer (“SD”) De Minimis Exception for Persons Engaging in Floor Trader Activities.

13-33

Title: 13-33







Description

No-Action Relief: Swaps Intended to be Cleared - Request for relief from certain disclosure and notice requirements and other duties imposed on swap dealers (SDs) and major swap participants (MSPs) pursuant to Commission regulations 23.402, 23.430, 23.431, 23.432, 23.434, 23.440, 23.450, and 23.451, as well as certain documentation requirements imposed on SDs and MSPs pursuant to Commission regulation 23.504.

13-32

Title: 13-32







Description

Request for Time-Limited No-Action Relief for Certain Swap Dealers from Compliance with Requirements of Commission Regulation 3.3 Relating to Annual Reports by Chief Compliance Officers.

13-31

Title: 13-31







Description

The Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (DSIO) issued a no-action letter stating that it will not recommend an enforcement action against an SD or MSP that omits certain "Excluded Data Fields" from the portfolio reconciliation process required under Regulation 23.502.

13-29

Title: 13-29







Description

No-Action Relief: Alternative to Fingerprinting to Establish Fitness of Associated Persons Residing Outside the United States.

13-20

Title: 13-20







Description

The Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the managing member of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affiliate (“designee”) to serve as the CPO of the pool instead, where, among other things: (1) the managing member and the designee are under common ownership and control; (2) the managing member has delegated all of its management authority to the designee; (3) the managing member does not engage in the solicitation of investors for the pool and does not manage property of the

13-19

Title: 13-19







Description

The Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affiliated CPO (“designee”) to serve as the CPO of the pool instead, where, among other things: (1) the general partner and the designee are under common ownership and control; (2) the general partner has delegated all of its management authority to the designee; (3) the general partner does not engage in the solicitation of investors for the pool and does not manage property of

13-18

Title: 13-18







Description

The Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partners of two commodity pools from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affiliated CPO (""designee"") to serve as the CPO of the pools instead, where, among other things: (1) the general partners and the designee are under common ownership and control; (2) the general partners have delegated all of their management authority to the designee; (3) the general partners do not engage in the solicitation of investors for the pools

13-17

Title: 13-17







Description

The Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partners of two commodity pools from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affiliated CPO (“designee”) to serve as the CPO of the pools instead, where, among other things: (1) the general partners and the designee are under common ownership and control; (2) the general partners have delegated all of their management authority to the designee; (3) the general partners do not engage in the solicitation of investors for the pools and do not manage pro