14-131
Title: 14-131
Extension of no-action relief from compliance with certain conditions associated with the receipt of customer funds by FCMs.
Extension of no-action relief from compliance with certain conditions associated with the receipt of customer funds by FCMs.
Staff issued an interpretation providing that a futures commission merchant (FCM) may credit a customer’s trading account for a margin payment upon the FCM’s initiation of a withdrawal from the customer’s bank account using the Automated Clearing House (ACH) payment processing system. The FCM also may consider such pending margin payments in computing its regulatory capital.
No-action relief for LCH.Clearnet Limited with regard to Regulations 1.20(g)(4) and 22.5, and an exemption from the requirements of Regulation 1.49(d)(3) for customer accounts held at the Bank of England.
No-action relief for the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. with regard to Regulations 1.20(d) and 22.5(a).
No-action relief from compliance with certain conditions associated with the receipt of customer funds by FCMs.
No-action relief for certain Introducing Brokers from filing certified and unaudited financial statements and calculating capital under regulation 1.17.
The Division of Clearing and Risk issued a letter stating that it will not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against Singapore Exchange Derivatives Clearing Limited (SGX-DC) clearing members for failing to comply with the Commodity Exchange Act Section 4d(f)(1) registration requirements in carrying existing positions and accepting for clearing offsetting positions in certain commodity swaps for U.S. customers; or SGX-DC for engaging in activities related to its clearing members carrying and accepting for clearing such positions for U.S. customers.
Additionally, in order for a SEF to avail itself of the no-action relief, the SEF must submit to the Commission by October 10, 2013: (1) Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6, any rule amendments that are necessary for full compliance with Commission Regulation 37.702(b), and any rule amendments that are necessary to facilitate full compliance with Commission Regulation 1.73(a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii), in accordance with the guidance issued by the Divisions on September 26, 2013 (Staff Guidance); and (2) A written representation that the SEF is undertaking all steps necessary to fully comply
No-Action Relief: Alternative to Fingerprinting to Establish Fitness of Associated Persons Residing Outside the United States.
Interpretation of Commission Regulation 1.73(a)(2)(iv).
Regulation 1.73 addresses risk management by clearing FCMs. Section (a)(2)(iv) provides that when a firm executes an order on behalf of a customer but gives it up to another firm for clearing, the clearing FCM shall establish risk-based limits and enter into an agreement in advance with the executing firm that requires the executing firm to screen orders for compliance with those limits.