The CPO of a master fund and two feeder funds whose sole investment was in the master fund requested an interpretation or exemption with respect to the due date of the final annual report for one of the feeder funds that ceased operation as of June 30, 2008. Participants in the feeder fund that was ceasing operation exchanged their units for units in the second feeder fund. The CPO proposed that, rather than filing an annual report by September 30, 2008 for the feeder fund ceasing operation, it be permitted to file the report by March 31, 2009.

The CPO of three commodity pools requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).

The CPO of commodity pool requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).

The CPO of commodity pool requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).

The CPO of two commodity pools requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).

The CPO of a commodity pool requested that DCIO agree to accept the Annual Report for the period from January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008 as the Pool’s final annual report despite the fact that the Pool had not fully liquidated due to the illiquid nature of two assets relating to the bankruptcies of two corporations. The two assets constituted less than one percent of the Pool’s net asset value and all other funds have been returned to participants.

The CPO of a commodity pool that operated pursuant to an exemption under Regulation 4.7 requested exemptive relief to permit it to file a final annual report for the period from January 1, 2008 through January 31, 2009. The Pool had nine participants on the date that the Trustee for the Pool determined to liquidate and a net asset value of $3X,XXX,XXX. The Pool made its final distribution to participants on January 31, 2009. DIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).

The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affiliated, registered CPO (“designee”) to serve as the CPO of the pool instead, where, among other things: (1) the general partner and the designee are under common ownership and control; (2) the general partner has delegated all of its management authority to the designee; (3) the general partner does not engage in the solicitation of investors for the pool and does not manage pr

The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affiliated, registered CPO (“designee”) to serve as the CPO of the pool instead, where, among other things: (1) the general partner and the designee are under common ownership and control; (2) the general partner has delegated all of its management authority to the designee; (3) the general partner does not engage in the solicitation of investors for the pool and does not manage pr

The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight granted exemptive relief from the books and records location requirement of Regulations 4.7 and 4.23.